On the Logic of the Social Sciences ~ by Jürgen Habermas, 1970, translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen and Jerry A. Stark, 1988, social philosophy, 220 pages
Okay, so I knew it wouldn't be an easy book to "study," but I did not expect a beginning like this that seems incomprehensible to me:
The once lively discussion initiated by Neo-Kantianism concerning the methodological distinctions between natural-scientific and social-scientific inquiry has been forgotten; the problems that gave rise to it no longer seem to be of contemporary relevance. Scientistic consciousness obscures fundamental and persistent differences in the methodological approaches of the sciences.
Scientistic? No, I did NOT misspell that word. I looked up the meaning of "scientistic" and found this definition:
- characterized by or having an exaggerated belief in the principles and methods of science.
- of, pertaining to, or characterized by scientism.
So now I need the definition of scientism:
- thought or expression regarded as characteristic of scientists.
- excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques.
Equally bad is that the first paragraph of this book takes up the whole first page, except for three lines of the second paragraph. I may not make it past page two!
Gilion at Rose City Reader hosts
Book Beginnings on Fridays.
Oh my. A Mind boggling book. I I think I would have slammed the book shut after the first page.
ReplyDeleteWow! Good luck with this one.
ReplyDeleteAt the bottom of my list of Books I Hope to Never Read Again are romance novels, horror, and textbooks.
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid this reads like a textbook to me.
Have mercy. I'm a lawyer, so I'm used to reading incomprehensible things and figuring out how to put them in plain English. That opening makes my eyes cross. Kudos to you if you power through it!
ReplyDeleteHappy weekend!
I showed the book to a very intelligent friend, and she took it home with her. I have no idea whether she'll try to read it, though.
ReplyDelete